One of my friends is enormously rich. I told him once—“Why don’t you donate something for a noble cause?”

He replied without the least hesitation, “Noble cause must earn nobly. Then the cause will look chaste. Public donation helps a mission turn unfaithful. In course of time it is nothing but just begging alms—taking advantage, putting pressure.”

I didn’t go deep into it. After some time I said again, “Well, what will you do with your immense treasure? How much men need to live healthy?

Yes, health brings wealth. And wealth expects us to be wise enough. Then why do rich people spend lavishly, indulge in mirth and merriment?

They are not supposed to do so. They should have guided themselves properly. They could easily support a mission maintaining its status, ought to have something to assure any constructive work without being selfishly motivated.

Then? What makes the difference? You talk of what I have been suggesting. You try to illustrate the same picture.

O yes, by all means. But not exactly that. Someone sought for donation and I gave, it’s not that simple. It should have come from the core of my heart. It’s to be spontaneous.

Unless I seek how you’d come to know about it? It is simple. You go on doing your duty in and around your locality. Your good behavior, earnestness, honesty etc. will gradually get publicity.

Along with others you form a Society or Trust. May you be unanimous in what you intend to do. Be it an orphanage, an old age home or women empowerment, you step out slow and steady. Why should you raise funds from outside? If you can involve local people, there will be least chance for corruption.

In that case nothing could be done in one life. True indeed. But if you’re in haste, you’ll fail to control others; others will also in jeopardy in the question of controlling you.

Why? There should be understanding among us. Again, on life is sufficient. You’re to do what you’re designed to. The rest will be done by others who come next. It’s an art and there’s no controversy in all that we know “Life is short; art is long.”

Leave it. Let’s come to the point.

Yes, mind that, more money means more pressure. A cleaver monk becomes a cunning fellow. With donation if a mission expands all of a sudden, there will be every chance of getting exploited. It will appear as an open field of satisfying others adjusting with their vested interest. Saints would turn demoralized, as poor (mentally) as ordinary men. They’ll enjoy life in a bit different way. There will be no question of any renunciation. Since they are not a family member, they will have the least responsibility about the common people.

No, no, basically they have sacrificed their lives for the well-being of humankind. Please listen. It is better not to be a member of such a marvelous enterprise.

Say, mission.

Yes, they are running after name and fame. Ultimately, nothing but shame! Shame!!

Stop it; you’ll be slain for such embarrassing analysis.

No, I am not going to tell anybody. It’s just as you wanted to know. Did I say to you such things ever before?

Really, what makes the difference? Leaving our family in the lurch, we are defeated everywhere by same-side goal. How measurable our life is!

Don’t worry. “Charity begins at home” has great implication. Let us do our duty, look after our family and friends and keep our eyes open. The rest will be done automatically.

How is it, please? You talk like a believer?

You are correct. It’s a long chapter. Unless you depend on someone, you will simply fail to win the battle of life. Don’t make a mistake. I won’t suggest any name in reality. We should cultivate within and realize someone in the core of our heart.

I didn’t like to proceed further. My friend possibly understood that. He softly said, “Leave it for future. Let’s enjoy this evening with a cup of tea thinking there’s many a slip ‘twist (between) cup and lip.

What does it actually mean, my dear friend?

Let’s consult the dictionary. Yes, it’s a proverb, which means “many things can go wrong between the start of a project and its completion, nothing is certain until it has happened.”

My beloved friend tenderly concludes, “Do we need anything more to explain? Then let’s start begging donation from door to door in our locality. Not an amount of money but honest and sincere mind, capable of doing well to our society. Let’s form our group”

Oh, fantastic! Tea was served. We sip, speechless.

Friends, blogging provides incentives. It’s a tree whose fruits are to be tasted. Let the time be ripened. There’s little chance of getting disheartened if we work sincerely. Well, am I correct? O yes, by all means.

Now let me come to the point. Leaders must learn. The more one learns the more one solves; the more one solves the more one learns. This cycle elevates our mind and our heart gets invigorated. But in reality we find just the opposite. Often we feel, there’s nothing to learn from anybody since we are established. No arrogant, in fact, can perform well in life. It’s also a form of terrorism. Please guard people and get the best of our society.

There is a gulf of difference between Hitler of Germany and Obama of America. What a great flexibility we observe in President Obama! We are supposed to learn from him and his team. But in reality we find, to our surprise, his country men misunderstand him. His every action is being challenged to detain him on the way. In the name of democracy aren’t all Fox News and eventually a kind of terrorism? Do we expect some kind of reform from your team? Yes, we do. Then do suggest them and oblige.

He is running after his commitments. From the very beginning of his holding the Presidential Chair, he has taken oath in the name of humanity. Non proliferation of nuclear warhead, climate change, racial and religious discord are so very serious affairs that keep him ever alert in the question of maintaining world peace. Any awkward hindrance will be recognized as terrorism, will it not? To assist the US President we are supposed to cultivate better ideas to enhance the spirit of service to humankind. If we have no idea to help him, isn’t it better to remain indifferent ignoring terrorism?

For an example, let us visit Kabul, Afghanistan. It is difficult for Obama administration find a way to work with Hamid Karzai. During his first term Mr. Karzai failed to prove himself as a good administrator. There are many reasons that we all know well why he will not be able to complete the second term with reputation. See, how the terrorism creeps in.

After all, Mr. Abdullah Abdullah was foreign minister; close to the President, Mr. Karzai. He couldn’t find a way but to contest the Presidential Election against him. Strangely, Mr. Karzai would form an inclusive administration that he would welcome members of the Taliban who are ready to work with the government. Something meaningless often meets measurable end. Oh, what a terrorism, indeed!

How will he be able to remove the stain of corruption? He hasn’t that personality. Then why he has been given a chance to continue as the President of Afghanistan? The answer is simple and that will soon come to light. Doesn’t it greatly involve the resistance against Taliban? It’s also a kind of terrorism, which is a must for well-being of Pakistan and India and that of the entire world.

Finally, Mr. Obama’s political sagacity will be proved. Anything against, proved to be vindictive, is nothing but terrorism. Stop it by any means to make us feel much more civilized in all our actions. Yes, US President should be criticized, but we must be above corruption. Otherwise all vested interests are merely nothing but terrorism. Right?

In this world of reality everything is business-oriented. Give and take is the best policy. In that light returns are inevitable. So without looking around and just hankering for achieving something, one must meditate and go on writing. Rewards are likely to come in time. In the eye of a terrorist this “time” is ever fogged up. Please look into it.

Oh! What a strange! Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State, is dauntless to throw charge against the Pakistani Government. “Pakistan is safe haven for Al Qaeda since 2002.” Let this worthy expression be stored and left in iron chest. We may discuss about it, if needed, afterward.

Now we are thrilled with something else. It’s very much inspiring to note that the terrorist in Pakistan have grown tough and are gaining importance day by day. There are the Maoist in India and the Taliban in Pakistan. They can shake hands with each other and enter into a new era. No outsider should interfere with their affair.

Look here gentlemen, I have a proposal. Please take it seriously. After an awkward partition in 1947 India and Pakistan are in jeopardy. It would be very much heartening if you can abolish the baseless partition and go back to original India. Bangladesh will surely join hands with you. In this context Afghanistan may well be considered one with you. A new name may also be thought of taking these four as a whole.

Looking toward China we can help everybody and combine into a larger country. What’s the use of occupying other territories as has long been doing by China. If we three or four, as the case may be, can achieve this goal, there will be least fear to keep the balance of power between India and china. Equilibrium is to be maintained in a civilized society. Otherwise China will be a slumbering threat to all of us.

There are lots of works to be accomplished. Just mass-killing, kidnapping etc. can never facilitate a good turnout and there will be no question of an ultimate gain. Let us be a big power and remain ever unchallengeable. This is the high time to rectify ourselves and get the maximum return expected in one life. Aspire something great for our future generation to be proud of.

Why don’t you, our Taliban and Maoist friends, teach the whole world in the light of Barack Obama, US President? Addressing the UN General Assembly on the 23 rd September, 2009 he proclaimed: “a new era of engagement”. Before all the national leaders he could keep his spinal column strong and stout in the UN conference. What an exemplary character! Come on, let us support him and remain emboldened.

In every religion fundamentalism is a course where a first class degree is conferred on all having no knowledge about their own religion. Of course, fundamentalism is not the only course to help growing terrorism with Master and Ph.D. in and around so many countries of this world. Poverty, social injustices, etc. are also at the root of such rigorous study.

However, I am not going in detail about it. I just want to know something else. What are the ideals of the terrorists who wouldn’t stop unless they arrive at their goal? They have definitely something in black and white, the rules and regulations they strictly follow. Isn’t it quite likely?

But the problem is unless it gets the recognition of a revolution, would it be ever able to hold the stirring of the existing government, whose administrative power they dislike most. Looking toward the Suburban in the boarder of Afghanistan and Pakistan; Mao, the philanthropist in India I raise this point.

How desperately their predecessors couldn’t but proceed and in the long run measurably fail in their venture! Sorrowfully, what’s the ultimate gain?

Having glanced through the newspaper one morning in my drawing room this was what I murmured when I saw a shadow in front of me. Before I turned back heard someone speaking.

Don’t you know? It’s very simple. After all, any terrorist group is led by a few leaders who operate every action, be it killing, kidnapping—whatever it may be to accomplish according to the need of the hour.

Now, those are in the fore, maintain a very good bank balance. If they survive, everything runs well-adjusted. Otherwise their family gets the benefit of their long struggle and operation. It’s in the end nothing but a business. Since money earning is getting tough day by day, this opening is now in practice to some specialist politicians in many countries.

Yes, this has been remarked by one of my friends who might be a member of a terrorist group. Would you like to share with him his knowledge and experience? You may be interested in as I am. The only hindrance is my old age. If you are young, come forward and go ahead. We have our best wishes to you. Perturb others to prosper in life. There’s nothing wrong in the light of success.

Finally, it is to request you, please don’t convey this message to the Home Ministry. In that case, those that read this news will be in danger.

Lately, I was in the office when in the waste paper basket particular news of Kolkata hospital caught a glimpse. I asked my subordinate, ‘What’s the matter; you didn’t draw my attention to such a success?’ In reply he affirmed, ‘It’s an exception and no news at all. Sir, it’s really an accident; doesn’t inspire us by and large.’ He looked cheerless. Presently he lost his wife in the oldest Medical College Hospital due to confusion among the medical board during her kidney replacement. I said caringly, ‘Yes, I realize your sentiment.’ Without going in debate, I started reading the paper.

It is reported that one 55 year old Monir Alam underwent a critical case of surgical treatment in Calcutta Medical Research Institute (CMRI) and neatly operated on the 20 October 2009. It took six hours to maneuver a tumor of 15 Kg. Covering a large area of abdominal cavity it pushed the right kidney, aorta and intestines to one side. The matter got complicated and as a result a rigorous case of hernia developed. It was apparently diagnosed when he called on a doctor feeling little uneasiness. God might have saved him forwarding his case to a better place. Otherwise how fatal it could have been after sometime!

It grew in many directions, the biggest portion located just below the liver. Strangely, the tumor grew without Alam’s any knowledge. He along with the members of his family took it as weight gain. Alam said that he had a feeling in his tummy which he took as nothing abnormal but gaining some weight.

However, the mystery was revealed before Dr. Sanjoy De Bakshi and immediately he along with four other physician-surgeons observed the case with all earnestness. With proper care it was operated. The patient is now out of danger, walking in the corridor. Soon he will be back to his home. It is reported that this was only the fourth such case of tumor across the world underwent surgery and healed. It’s really fantastic!

Sadly, in spite of such a success everyday compartment-packed patients are leaving West Bengal to have better treatment in the South. Might be also from Bihar and Odisha. Of course, there is every reason in favour of their going afar. Since it is a very special case, hardly one can believe in staying in Kolkata and get proper treatment. Series of such critical cases are being attended everyday in Apollo, Velore and such other renowned Hospitals and patients across the country throng together with confidence.

Generous Instablog Team is to decide among five set of pictures which or how many will they kindly upload to make this article impressive. I owe, above all, much to them. Obviously, all of us.

Truly talented one is ever impartial in every field of life. If he belongs to any class or party, he should be, at least, broad-minded even to the opponent. We must have acid tests of such a statement before we accept one as exemplary and ideal who should lead our society. Here, on one side we find Dr. Manmohan Singh, our Prime Minister, and on the other, Shri Sourav Gangopadhya, one of the outstanding Cricket Captains of India.

Dr. Singh, as we all know, one of the greatest economists of the world today. He could be awarded Nobel Prize on Economics this year. However, apart from that identity, he seems to be a great leader. We have long been watching his behaviour with Buddhadev Bhattachrya and Mamata Bondyopadhya who often meet him to seek solutions to their problems.

He is so loyal to Indian Constitution that there is no hesitation from his part to render any help to Buddhadev of CPM, Chief Minister of West Bengal. Again, he attaches great importance to the words of Mamata of Trinamool Congress, our Railway Minister. Although Dr. Singh stands as a great leader of Congress, he is never confused dealing with both of them. He remains ever impartial with other MPs who approach him for cooperation in their respective states. This is, no doubt, a rare quality we yearn to have from a politician who is likely to look after his party’s interest. Here stands Dr. Singh, by all means, truly exception and highly sagacious.

Now what we find in our beloved Sourav? As per an article of Aninday Jana in Ananda Bazar Patrika, published in the Editorial page last Sunday, the October 25, 2009, it makes us happy to go through the post mortem of Saurav’s outstanding explanations where he stands as an exemplary character, a matchless Bengali.

In a short speech Sourav said, “I was an ardent fan of Buddhadev Bhattachrya. I am and will remain. “Uni/she (refers to Mamata Banerjee. By name she could be addressed and honoured) personally invited me to join the celebration in laying the foundation stone of Satyajit Roy Stadium and I was present there.

Anybody, whoever he or she may be, requests me to such an assembly for the development of games and sports, I will be there.” After a little silence Sourav boldly established, “What I could think earlier, Buddhababu is the best possible Chief Minister Bengal could ever have had. So I do think still today. Nobody should feel messy, please.” Aninday puts great emphasis on this last sentence and explains elaborately Sourav’s worthiness.

I am an engineer, a philosopher but basically a philanthropist; belong to no party rigorously as my political identity. Again, is it wise to expose our involvement on such an occasion? Keeping harmony as a rule is anticipated from a great leader. Whoever comes in the fore his or her words of good intentions gradually gets restrained and everything appears all the same amidst corruption, injustice and chaotic in the administration. So after two terms, change of power in the Assemblies and Parliament is very essential to distribute the fruits of better administration unconfined to common people. Leave it; it’s a point of debate.

After only eight years of Buss administration, a large number of people of America couldn’t but dream of a radical change and as a result, irrespective of colour and white, President Obama, the brilliant Democrat, is in his position. Similarly, a large number of voters in West Bengal being utterly disappointed thought seriously of a change to turn down 32 years of CPM administration in W.B. Are we supposed to accept that except Sourav most of all the distinguished are living in fool’s paradise?

However, I pray to God, let Sourav remain ever loyal to Buddhababu. As Karna of Mahabharata he must stand boldly to propagate the sermon of Buddhababu. But the only problem that sets us thinking is the email of Sourav which went against Jogmohan Dalmia and he was largely in the lurch. He was shocked and uttered softly, “As time changes, loyalty does. This is nothing new in this world.”

Do we find anything as such in Dr. Manmohan Singh?

Tags: Manmohan, Sourav, Buddhadev, Mamata, sagacity, harmony

asokananda.prosad@gmail.com

We, the Indian, are very much interested in every issue now being exposed centering President Obama and the member of his Senate. India and America, two democratic countries, are often facing problems associated with the rational thinking of media and the opponent. In any case, we are none of China, Pakistan or such other countries and we are proud of that. But often a question peeps in our mind how far we are advanced following freedom of speech, writing and enjoying life as we please?

In US media at present, Fox News plays a role to put things in a mess. As a result “Fox War” by Chrles Krauthammer, published in “The Washington Post” seems to be outstanding. ‘Fox News’ has resemblance with ‘Firefox’ but it is possibly not wild in nature. After all, some unfavorable thinking gain importance day by day and get supported by others of the USA. On the contrary, the watchdogs in the White House can never be as good as pet dogs. Within the Senate there are different views but have had to come to a settlement which gets reflected in the expression of the President.

Our Cabinet ministers and their members of the Senate are competent enough to shoulder the burden of the respective countries following definite thought sequence and ideal, principles and guide lines. There must be a unity among the said members and it is quite likely. So when President Obama is dumb at the Fox News, the administration is likely to be ‘still dumb’. Frankly, when different media has had control why Fox News turn wild? There’s no use going in debate on this issue. Leave it.

Now, none can ignore what the writer exposes in support of the Fox News as regards the voice of the White House: ‘opinion journalism masquerading as news’ and ‘not really a news station’. Consequently, what has long been spread as Fox News does not gain so very importance in the making of the nation. Naturally, misunderstanding creeps in. US constitution approves freedom in every respect by and large as Indian does. But politically motivated persons in a particular region often cross the limit of decency and decorum. This is never desirable.

In every country, in fact, opposition can never allow better birth to the administration; they oppose for the sake of opposition only just to make people understand their wise involvement for the next term. As a result, administration at every step gets challenge and awkward hindrance in the advancement of a democratic country. Ultimately, we gain little or lose more. Maybe, just the reverse. It depends.

Excuse me for making a simple query. Is it that almost all the US Journalists stand diagonally opposite in every issue Obama faces after Nobel Peace Prize, 2009 conferred on him? The picture was not so only a few days ago. Naturally, we, the journalists around the world, set to think about the latest post-mortem of Obama. We should have received the columnists heartily. Sadly, I don’t find them well-suited with me.

Americans are, at present, so very critical about every action of their President that I doubt about the wisdom of the Democrat, the insight of the columnists, all the distinguished and the voter in general who established Obama’s contest in the Presidential election in 2008 to secure a overall change. It’s not that they lack in laudable intelligence, controlled sentiment, understanding others and power of reasoning. But their political sagacity appears to me clouded and clumsy.

Richard Cohen in his valued article: “Obama’s Identity Crisis” published in “The Washington Post” on October 20, 2009 has applied his power of thinking and analysis. It’s, in fact, a fine censure. He begins saying “Barack Obama is his own worst enemy”. Count down has just started. It has been nicely illustrated that Obama “is pretty close to the most perfect person you will never get to know”.

“This is what he does not do in the course of the primary and general election campaigns: He does not lose his temper. He does not curse. He does not follow a pretty woman with his eyes or sneak a smoke. He does not dress sloppily. He is always calm and always good-natured…” What better is expected of an ideal man, please?

Exceptionally, this can never be expected from an American, even when whose origin is 100% white. Something unusual has been detected and we thank you Cohen, for such compliments about him. Had he been truly yours, he should have denied of these attributions. Take it from a true Indian; Obama is the right person who is designed to do something good and significant for the entire world. Please don’t poison him.

With the context of a movie Cohen raised some points to march into crude reality, “In a conventional movie, the hero has to change. Something has to happen — the moment when character is revealed. Maybe he loses the girl and has to get her back. In politics, something similar is supposed to happen. …your walk on the beach with Billy Graham, your impoverished childhood, your mission work abroad, etc“—Oh! What an evaluation! We are simply absorbed.

“Obama has those moments — abandoned by his father, biracial in a world that prefers things neat, rose in Indonesia — but they are not cited as life-changing events. None of them, at any rate, are given much importance in the documentary. Even the bitter primary fight with Hillary Clinton — all that ugly stuff about race and Bill Clinton, of all people, being accused of playing the race card–could have been happening to someone else. Obama observes his own life. He’s not a participant.”–It is you to decide how far he was politically motivated.

“He is something new, something young, something biracial and something black, but he is not something from a political or ideological constituency. He is adored by his fans–not for something he’s done, but rather for something he is. So far, that has been a weakness in Obama’s presidency.”–Would you think twice about what you couldn’t but mention?

Well, didn’t you have the intention to measure the actual depth of Obama? On Friday, October 9, 2009 **Describing himself as “both surprised and deeply humbled,” Obama said he did not view the award as a “recognition of my own accomplishment” but as a way to give impetus to broadly shared aspirations.** Again, he said, he would accept the prize” as a call to action” to confront the challenges of the 21 st century, including nuclear nonproliferation, climate change and racial and religious discord.**–That was just the beginning.

Bernard Shaw said, “Politics is the game of scoundrels.” Of course, all the politicians do not like to uphold that status. There are honest and loyalist. Any way, this attribution has worsened the spirit of power politics in all the countries around the world. So with an open mind this can safely be said that world peace is in jeopardy among so many politicians in and around America. Obama can earnestly aspire but who’s there to listen to him?

Finally, without going in details about the attributions applicable to the challenger, I surmise that Obama is made of steel; none can shape him as his sweet will. Under any circumstances Obama is competent enough, surrounded by the members of the undaunted Senate and so many people by his side, to take the lead. You needn’t be afraid at all. If he fails to achieve all that you expect him to accomplish, he will have to pay for that. After a considerable time, as the antagonist will determine, you better get organized to impeach him.

The Peace Committee, Oslo, is requested not to allow the horror-struck American Journalists to run a risk amidst their Constitution.

“The award of the peace prize to a sitting president is not unprecedented. But Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson received the honor for their past actions: Roosevelt’s efforts to end the Russo-Japanese War and Wilson’s work in establishing the League of Nations.”—So is reported on the 16 th day of October, 2009 in a valued article: “An unconstitutional Nobel” in “The Washington Post”.

Dear friends, you should have mentioned that during those times US Constitution approved the said Presidents and there were no problem in the acceptance of their award? Maybe since both of them were white. Senate had nothing to disapprove. Although Obama is colored; being color there are so many constitutional and unconstitutional barriers. He will have to cross many hurdles to fetch Olympic Gold Meddles in so many stipulated events. Then only such a prestigious prize in his favor would get approval in the classic mind. What a tough competition!

Don’t worry; your ‘important legal questions’ are being discussed all over the world everyday after the 9 th instant. It is after all not an issue exclusively of the Americans. You all are so strong in your respective zones that often you don’t care to tolerate the strongest one, who stands diagonally opposite, rather poles apart.

“The five-member Nobel commission is elected by the Sorting, the parliament of Norway.”—They were unanimous in their opinion. What a strange absurdity! But before that there were ‘the record 205 nominees for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize’. The first choice of the majority was obviously, in favor of our (sorry, your) Mr. Barack, living out in the open. Am I correct?

“Thus the Nobel Prize is an emolument, and a foreign one to boot.” O my God! When these gentlemen will be in a position to respect others? How ‘deserted Obama’ will be their eye-opener? We, the members of developing countries, move back and forth as regards political sagacity; let the US awareness in the fore decide the crux of the matter. It’s not so easy to get to.

**A federal statute provides that if the president accepts a “tangible or intangible present” for more than a minimal value from any foreign government, the gift “shall become the property of the United States.**–You raise the question of paying tax. Well, when the billionaires are paying scheduled Taxes, there will be no problem for ‘poor Obama’ to pay the amount. On that very day he gave up the fabulous amount to noble cause. Naturally, it’s not at all a problem as you think it to be. Definitely your Constitution have that provision.

“Taking President Obama at his word that the Nobel award is “an affirmation of American leadership,” Congress should allow him to accept the award. The prize money, which legally belongs to the United States, ought to be applied by Congress to some worthy cause, …”—Finally, in the way of advising your Honorable President you seem to be little reasonable and reserved.

I see, you don’t have the prophecy to measure the actual depth of Obama. On Friday, October 9, 2009, three Post Staff Writers reported—**Describing himself as “both surprised and deeply humbled,” Obama said he did not view the award as a “recognition of my own accomplishment” but as a way to give impetus to broadly shared aspirations.** Again, he said, he would accept the prize” as a call to action” to confront the challenges of the 21 st century, including nuclear nonproliferation, climate change and racial and religious discord.** from the then you dog him; he is silent.

“…that would honor Alfred Nobel’s desire to promote “fraternity between nations” and fulfill the intent of the Framers that congressional approval would guard against attempts by foreign governments to meddle in American politics by dangling presents, titles or any other emoluments in front of our public officials.”–The question of white-American prestige is at stake. There are so many academics; the particular “emolument” will soon be invented to make you feel emboldened.

No, no, please don’t allow the gentleman who secured the highest score in the Presidential Election in America to feel little shaky. Not to speak of so many idiotic among the rest of the world, he must depend on your wise judgment. What a setback! Sometime media lacks in intellectual fitness and as a result, the administration suffers from acute case of dehydration.

Gentlemen, let him face the challenge. Obama should go to Oslo all alone. We, the members of the rest of the world are always with him. He must achieve what he aspires and this is evidently for which stands matchless the humanitarian Nobel Peace Committee. They are wise enough to smell something from afar. Now it is all up to you to decide the fate of the future generations.

Finally, if your constitution approves President Barack Obama will be yours; if it doesn’t, he will be ours. Are the Americans ready to accept our challenge?

With regards, I remain yours in the Divine.

(asokananda.prosad@gmail.com)

Is there any better way to highlight President Obama?

I have been desired to make a comment on “A Peace Prize to Share” of by Tom Brokaw; published in “The Washington Post” on Thursday, October 15, 2009.

A few lines to highlight.–“In one way or another, President Obama’s critics will dog him all the way to Oslo for the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony.”

He’s getting a lot of advice on how to handle the moment when he accepts the prize, so here’s an idea.”

The president should invite a high-profile and wide-ranging delegation of interests to accompany him. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Michael Mullen, representing diplomacy and arms in pursuit of peace. Greg Mortenson…”

Obama might think of inviting former president George H.W. Bush and praising the work done during the Reagan-Bush years in managing the collapse of the Soviet Union and, for example, the reunification of Germany in such an impressive fashion…“

The White House would have a long list of compassionate and effective organizations and individuals to choose from, and in his acceptance speech the president could remind the world that they’ve been at this for a long time, not just the past nine months.”

the Norwegian Nobel Committee wanted to honor President Obama’s determination to put a new face on America’s efforts to shape a more peaceful world, what better way for him to respond than to share this distinguished prize with those who have been doing just that without sufficient recognition?”

Barack Obama’s name will be the one on the peace prize, but his speech and his manner could become a gift for generations to come.

We should appreciate what Mr. Tom Brokaw has kindly suggested. Barack Obama is likely to accept a long list from the voters who couldn’t but cast their valuable votes in favor of none but Obama.

From your point of view I doubt about Obama’s spinal cord. Is he really a human being with vertebral column? His political sagacity can never be denigrated so easily.

Frankly, we, the Indian, know him very little. You are specialized about his critical activities for a long time. Naturally, when you denounce him for any of his action, we should and must admit that.

Here the most unfortunate Obama is seriously involved in the hustle and bustle of some miscreants of the Nobel Peace Committee, Oslo. Maybe, there are so many persons playing their role as and when a change of political itinerary in America is the need of the hour.

However, I have tried to explain those points in my way in a letter to Michael Gerson for his article: “A Prize for Star Power” published on Wednesday, October 14, 2009 in ‘The Washington Post’. If you can’t get it please write to me, I will send you a printed copy. I may as well email you the content for your kind perusal and immediate action.

asokananda.prosad@gmail.com